From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 28 19:43:15 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E78A16A41F;
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:43:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com)
Received: from orsfmr005.jf.intel.com (fmr20.intel.com [134.134.136.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364E943D45;
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:43:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com)
Received: from orsfmr101.jf.intel.com (orsfmr101.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.17])
	by orsfmr005.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1
	2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j9SJhCPj021782; 
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:43:12 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com
	[192.168.65.206])
	by orsfmr101.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2
	2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j9SJhCN9015519; 
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:43:12 GMT
Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56])
	by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id
	M2005102812431219579 ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:43:12 -0700
Received: from orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.209]) by
	orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); 
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:43:12 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:43:11 -0700
Message-ID: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E033A99FE@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron)
thread-index: AcXb7kCUcwMuFztUS6qRmxN3rWwbOgACSanw
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>, "Jung-uk Kim" <jkim@freebsd.org>,
	"Nate Lawson" <nate@root.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2005 19:43:12.0561 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[D4ECA210:01C5DBF7]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.7.209.17
Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Mathieu Prevot <mathieu_prevot@yahoo.fr>
Subject: RE: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:43:15 -0000

> > > This looks to me=20
> > > like the pci_link code is pointing the interrupt source at the=20
> > > wrong part of the resource descriptor.  Perhaps it is not=20
> > > incrementing the pointer correctly for 64-bit arches.

I would be interested in knowing if FreeBSD is using the ACPI CA
resource manager code, or is parsing the raw AML resource template
buffers on its own.

One advantage to using the resource manager is that the resources are
converted to a format that is easier for upper code to analyze (and
therefore less prone to error.)

Thanks,
Bob