From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 18 00:09:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6250F1065672 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 00:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147DF8FC08 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 00:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so1565024ana.13 for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 17:09:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3RX/QqGmsQPJ7+Bdd5iC5WmaFNwDbKRJ9pNxEvLj0AI=; b=UsdLppOjJjeAZhnxErcKxCI7lTECQoHezIxd/4AWbXHKyq1GjdUA8S2yL+v5jfdctc ElB4AuMBNjZY7wDwm91XyOICgU+IhlhBJpe6+VZhDYjjPgvRf5vAKQqbj2bmDfg5SilI TRCvNgo6Q7aZTLXUcQdyckDTs4wvGnmSEp0+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=sWNSPCs3aUhME2XZY6W08Jssgm/l/Me0iOnyjKkDGv5l+Usby/IS67e65+Pb5w1ZV9 p7zKBWYUbdakm8SIjq8n3e7ux2PbKpe+XWOyJXH0K6L5RsGhxrsxbMLfqysEqMALUYcX 5HNfBp3k1Ao3B2RPM2Tl1jXYKokdJWTkjlzEk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.241.13 with SMTP id o13mr7604004anh.91.1242605340250; Sun, 17 May 2009 17:09:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28283d910905171643n991c64bjb67cf3371aefe27@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com> <28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6@mail.gmail.com> <28283d910905171643n991c64bjb67cf3371aefe27@mail.gmail.com> From: matt donovan Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:08:40 -0400 Message-ID: <28283d910905171708u75b6d53dlaf593b307e30ae90@mail.gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:09:01 -0000 On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, matt donovan wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan >> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci < >> pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>wrote: >> > >> >> Josh Rickmar wrote: >> >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc. >> >> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both >> do >> >> > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed >> >> > replacement for screen.) >> >> > >> >> Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ? the NO_PACKAGE in >> >> screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good >> >> replacement I'm so there. >> >> >> > tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in X it works >> wonders. >> >> tmux works just fine at a console without X running. >> >> >> > hmm odd since last time I asked about it it did not since I m the one that > brought it up, since I had an error and was told that the sc does not > support that feature what freebsd are you running since I tired it in 7.x. > forgot something unless of coruse your using a term change trick that I suggested to the author of tmux.