From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 00:50:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A8A16A420 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 00:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF3743D46 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 00:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 43328 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Nov 2005 00:50:07 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 8.641179 secs); 02 Nov 2005 00:50:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 2 Nov 2005 00:49:57 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Jason Morgan'" , Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:49:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20051101234633.GB17387@sentinelchicken.net> Thread-Index: AcXfPqgItJWvkPpeRmOAXcYge1CvbQACEIsA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113089259867543298@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051102005008.8AF3743D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: Quick Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:50:09 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: > > > > On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Jason Morgan wrote: > > >... > > >Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the > > >Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to > > >systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the > > >outside world from both subnets. My only remaining issue > is getting > > >to the web app setup for the Linksys - I can only do it > from a local > > >address (meaning a 192.168.1.x address). The Linksys refuses > > >connections from my 10.0.0.x subnet. Is this a NAT issue? > > > > > > > Most Linksys routers deny configuration from the WAN interface by > > default. You MUST configure the linksys router initially to enable > > administration via the WAN interface. At the very least, > please set a > > reasonable password and enable https! > > Yeah, the router was denying connections from 10.0.0.0. I > have fixed this, changed the password, and disallowed > alterations from the WAN. Great! However, to the previous poster... You may have missed it, but we had eliminated the WAN from the equation early on. He is using the AP on the layer-2 side only. The WAN is connected to nothing, so that was not the issue (so far as I was involved in this thread). I understand that the default on a Linksys does not allow WAN admin, but again, that was not the case here. Jason...what fixed it? Was it the addition of the new static route? Please enlighten me. Tks, Steve > > Once again, thanks everyone for the help. > > > > > ----- > > Eric F Crist > > Secure Computing Networks > > http://www.secure-computing.net > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >