From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 27 04:30:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70B4A73 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE3D163C for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r5R4U1SK095968; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:30:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r5R4U1xU095965; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:30:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:30:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Chris H Subject: re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade? In-Reply-To: <9580eaf8d7706197d1fee71c90ed7f20.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> Message-ID: References: <67588ada736599c95cac241b3c3af730.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <9580eaf8d7706197d1fee71c90ed7f20.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:30:02 -0600 (MDT) Cc: matthias.andree@gmx.de, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:30:15 -0000 On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: >> >> Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: >> % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg >> >> The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, >> follow all the steps that apply to your system since that date. That should say "all the steps in /usr/ports/UPDATING that apply to your system since that date." >> I recommend portmaster. It does almost everything portupgrade does, but >> without the overhead of Ruby or bdb. > Greetings Warren, and thank you for your reply. > > Sounds like the plan. I'll take your advice, and run with it. > Gave me just the confidence I needed. :) Good! Please post if you have any problems.