From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 21:34:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705DDB95 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p3plsmtpa11-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2807A26C9 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 21:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by p3plsmtpa11-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id Mxaf1o00C4XeM0101xafQH; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:34:40 -0700 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:34:50 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Subject: Re: initialise ports tree (WAS: long string using find and "-exec ls -ls" to find part-of filename) Message-ID: <20140703213450.GA16589@ethic.thought.org> References: <20140630053004.GB16901@ethic.thought.org> <20140630064044.GA25085@ethic.thought.org> <20140630230316.44ec3257.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140630213909.GA21861@ethic.thought.org> <20140630235832.9ec60e91.freebsd@edvax.de> <53B21850.6060904@calorieking.com> <20140701052711.GA30357@ethic.thought.org> <20140703073949.6a82041d.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140703073949.6a82041d.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:34:47 -0000 ===== Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 27++ years of service to the Unix community. On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:39:49AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:27:11 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > ===== > > Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. > > Of_Interest: With 27++ years of service to the Unix community. > > > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:09:20AM +0800, Gregory Orange wrote: > > > On 01/07/14 05:58, Polytropon wrote: > > > >On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:39:09 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > >> One totally OT thing. my sysadmin is or will be on his honeymoon > > > >> but installed FBSD 10.X. without ports. do you know what magic > > > >> command I use to install the entire ports tree? > > > > > > > >You can either use the installation media or pull it from FTP: > > > > > > Why not use portsnap? It's just so easy. > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html > > > > > > # portsnap fetch extract > > > > [...] > > > > "portsnap"; indeed. > > This is probably the most convenient method both for initializing > and updating your ports tree if you don't need split-second deltas > (which only SVN can deliver). :-) > ye-gods! SVN? is that like CVS? I do know "RCS" well enough to track _my own_ revisions. CVS? just Barely. it's the CVS kin utilities where I *really* go off the rails. :-) I got in trouble at work trying to keep my perl OS tests in sync. iv'e been graced with enough patience that I can wait several billionths/sec to get the latest deltas [&c], thank you. > > > I was betting that it wouldnt be there > > but yeah, zeus loves me. > > It's an essential port of the _operating system_ itself. > > > > Partially off-topic addition (which I think I can address to the list > in case a direct message doesn't come through): When using "reply all", > I got an error message from your MTA (via the relay of my ISP). This > is the message (trimmed): > > : host smtp.secureserver.net[68.178.213.203] said: 552 5.2.0 > This message has been rejected > due to content judged to be spam by the internet community??IB212 > (in reply to end of DATA command) > Action: failed > Status: 5.2.0 > Remote-MTA: dns; smtp.secureserver.net > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 552 5.2.0 > This message has been rejected due to content judged to be spam by the > internet community??IB212 > > * end message * > > The "Internet community" _judges_ message list replies spam? > I'm not sure. The reason is explained this way: > > The email message contains a link, attachment, > or pattern caught by our filters as spam. > > What "pattern" might that be? A code snippet? A stupid code > snippet? A HTTP or FTP link? As I said, I'm not sure. > > Maybe you could check the settings of the installation handling > your mail? > > thought.org mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net. > thought.org mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net. > > Just to make sure you can continue receiving helpful replies > from this list... :-) > could this have anything to do with my having quit my subscriptions to the -questions list?? when my systems admin flew up last year he moved my registrar from GKG.net to a registrar I had never heard of. godaddy.[com|net]. godaddy ignored all my DNS and BIND files and used they own automated scripts. usually mail works; sometimes it takes around 25-30 seconds to go out. The rest of the time--very rarely--the godaddy mail handling hangs. has anybody else on this list seen this kind of behavior with godaddy? I'll ask my sysadmin. send him the pertinent parts of this mail. > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-seven years of service to the Unix community.