From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 22:04:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE503106564A for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:04:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9417A8FC1C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:04:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LNaK0-0004hQ-Rc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0000 Received: from 220.85-200-86.bkkb.no ([85.200.86.220]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0000 Received: from solskogen by 220.85-200-86.bkkb.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christer Solskogen Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:04:09 +0100 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20090115192516.GA3395@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.85-200-86.bkkb.no User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081204 Thunderbird/3.0b1 In-Reply-To: <20090115192516.GA3395@aurora.oekb.co.at> Sender: news Subject: Re: portupgrade <-> portmaster? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:04:21 -0000 On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster? > Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary packages to upgrade your system. portmaster can create them (by adding the -g option) - but not use them. This is the reason we use portupgrade at work where we have several FreeBSD servers which shares /usr/ports. > Is there also a way back, i.e. from portmaster to portupgrade? > No problem at all. You can even have both installed. If you upgrade your outdated port with portupgrade, portmaster will not try to upgrade it and vice versa, unless you force it to (which makes no sense). -- chs