From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 14:26:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84538575; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@ixsystems.com) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com (newknight.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 644612201; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (mail.ixsystems.com [10.2.55.1]) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D750663663; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com ([10.2.55.1]) by localhost (mail.ixsystems.com [10.2.55.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07675-07; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.103] (c-67-180-208-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.208.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FB436365E; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ixsystems.com; s=newknight0; t=1376922381; bh=FyOT7XLdP2jPyqrU3b31PSMGUUvxVhaVEcOw+jllU3c=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Cc:From:Subject:Date:To; b=E5Oo149Zbh1ynM891EfYOMcDiSnk7BmqVcimu8ve+jwQlWOHcihxdLytWmbnyZa0D Q0uykyjX9LkFVUwZ2xAkS4LhrgSW6LH8IBBRum21nlqOkXQcW8fR8e3ObQKsliqJTU 1BEWpQYrzCkIFmcO30EdM7NcpL41v1WLC2wDcitY= References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51D9B24B.8070303@ixsystems.com> <51DACE93.9050608@freebsd.org> <520DC77C.1070003@ixsystems.com> <520DE306.4080004@freebsd.org> <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19B7F957-EF1D-4452-986A-3F4C51CA647E@ixsystems.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:26:19 -0700 To: Andre Oppermann Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , "re@freebsd.org" , "nonesuch@longcount.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:26:22 -0000 On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wonderin= g can I commit this to >>> 9-stable now? (or is it already in?) >>=20 >> It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the >> call for testers. There were a couple of replies that it is being >> tested but no statements either way if it was good or not. Hence >> I erred on the side of caution and refrained from committing it. >=20 > Revisiting the history of this after vacation absence actually shows > that we straddled the release code freeze deadline and you had provided > good testing feedback. However the MFC got rejected by RE on the fear > of introducing unknown regressions into the release process. >=20 >>> Would you do the honors? >>=20 >> Yes, will do later today. >=20 > Committed to stable/9 as r254515. >=20 > Let me know if there are any issues. Thanks Andre. Maybe we can do a point release/patch release with this in a few weeks for 9= .2.1 or 9.2p1 because 9.2 out of the box performance is abysmal not only in n= etworking but also disk as maxvnodes is clipped way too small even with plen= ty of ram.=20 >=20 > --=20 > Andre >=20