From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 10:52:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F5E16A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:52:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B29143D53 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ka0ttic@gentoo.org) Received: from morpheus.ka0ttic.dyndns.org (114.175.205.68.cfl.rr.com [68.205.175.114])iA3AqLB7029965; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 05:52:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (bedlam [192.168.1.50]) by morpheus.ka0ttic.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7E12953B7; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 05:52:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4188A1B5.3010609@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:15:33 -0500 From: Aaron Walker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041006) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: Kirk Strauser cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:52:26 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kris Kennaway wrote: | On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 05:36:17PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: |>Out of curiosity, are those ports like to have equivalents in Gentoo's |>"portage" system? Those guys love to build with -O310 -fomit-instructions |>but their stuff seems to pretty much work. Why do we seem to have so many |>problems with (presumably?) the same software on our system? | | | Don't know, perhaps they don't care about the fraction of ports that | don't work properly since the rest of them have such eleet | optimization. Trust me, we care. As another poster pointed out, packages that have known problems with certain flags either replace them with safe alternatives or filter them. Btw, we don't all use insane CFLAGS. We just happen to have a greater number of clueless users who don't fully understand the flags they decide to use ;) Cheers - -- Multics is security spelled sideways. Aaron Walker < ka0ttic@gentoo.org > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ka0ttic/ Gentoo/BSD | cron | shell-tools http://butsugenjitemple.org/~ka0ttic/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBiKG1C3poscuANHARAm0hAKC6EKDGWYXnwt1X4GpA0muza7B7BgCdE+m8 XPEQHx0HC9B/WpJy9JAs9s8= =NcGx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----