From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Aug 13 07:27:58 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id HAA24109
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 13 Aug 1995 07:27:58 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA24103
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 1995 07:27:55 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id HAA07430; Sun, 13 Aug 1995 07:27:47 -0700
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 1995 07:27:47 -0700
Message-Id: <199508131427.HAA07430@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: chuckr@Glue.umd.edu
CC: tom@misery.sdf.com, julian@ref.tfs.com, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950813101912.796A-100000@mocha.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Sun, 13 Aug 1995 10:20:40 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: tcl port
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * The -m option went out with the cdrom, but that ldconfig option still 
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I beg your pardon, which CDROM are you talking about?!?  That sure as
heck can't be the Walnut Creek 2.0.5-RELEASE CDROM, right?!?

Satoshi

P.S. Dripping sarcasm, yeah, but I've put lots of work to make sure
  the ports tree and the source tree agree with each other, I can't
  stand this kind of blatant disinformation infect the mailing
  list....