From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 29 16:41:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E462216A4CE for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 16:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D707543D48 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 16:41:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B03BC34480; Sat, 29 May 2004 20:41:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF43933C5D for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 20:41:53 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 20:41:53 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040529203815.G907@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: SCHED_BSD vs SCHED_ULE ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 23:42:00 -0000 Is there a circumstance where the older SCHED is better then ULE? Or is the older one something that will eventually just be removed altogether? If the older does have areas in which it is the better, are there any docs comparing the two? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664