From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Tue Jan 26 19:17:03 2016
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9979A6EA47;
 Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC12EA3F;
 Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id AA2B214A3; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:17:03 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>,
 "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>,
 "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>,
 Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>,
 "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r407237 - head/mail/imaputils
Message-ID: <20160126191703.GA84104@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201601251910.u0PJAdeU003331@repo.freebsd.org>
 <20160126141038.GA46193@FreeBSD.org>
 <4C5F6D463ACD91B52D4AC5AF@ogg.in.absolight.net>
 <20160126153932.GC46193@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAMuy=+gjxtuEviVKavXhp6TqASn3010d88S0YNJSA2E15_-gbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160126182312.GA54534@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAMuy=+jB2QtOsY5Y8-N6hZbqU6uqtXKWB2JNpnb_ugTB9Jpwmw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuy=+jB2QtOsY5Y8-N6hZbqU6uqtXKWB2JNpnb_ugTB9Jpwmw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:17:03 -0000

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:47:07AM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I believe there was a misunderstanding. I wasn't suggesting a follow-up
> commit.

Again, ENOPARSE, sorry.  Why would you suggest a follow-up commit in a
message about wrong attribution in a follow-up commit? ;-)

> I understand that we ask for a patch, but there are many that are simply
> reported, and someone else will fix it. This was the reasoning behind
> submitting this PR.
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195252

Yeah, I think it makes sense for those people who like to use commit log
templates (personally I don't).  I also use "Reported by" when needed; if
it reflects the reality better, that is (same for "Noticed by", "Prodded
by", et cetera).

./danfe