From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 26 22:05:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FDC1065677 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gonzo@freebsd.org) Received: from core.tav.kiev.ua (tavex.colocall.com [62.149.10.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBFF8FC38 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gonzo@freebsd.org) Received: from [76.77.86.2] (helo=[10.80.5.136]) by core.tav.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1MKIlB-000IUq-BV; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:15:02 +0300 Message-ID: <4A453A38.8010101@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:14:32 -0700 From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neelkanth Natu References: <25885.49433.qm@web34405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <25885.49433.qm@web34405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Core-Spam-Level: / X-Core-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "core.tav.kiev.ua", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Neelkanth Natu wrote: > Hi Warner, > > I have attached the diffs against -current at revision 194280. > > There are some changes in the diff that are unrelated to the sibyte > work and probably should be committed separately. > > I can provide more information about changes to specific files if necessary. Thanks for contribution. I'm trying to make platform-independent part of mips/ tree and userland stable and once it's done more time will be available for adding new platforms (I hope it will be soon enough) :) Meanwhile I'd appreciate if you test attached patch for busdma with your hardware. This implementation has been shamelessly ripped from arm code tree and should handle alignment/boundaries limitations properly. If possible, test with several DMA-enabled devices working simultaneously. Thanks. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/mips booting on Sibyte 1250 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:05:37 -0000 Neelkanth Natu wrote: > Hi Warner, > > I have attached the diffs against -current at revision 194280. > > There are some changes in the diff that are unrelated to the sibyte > work and probably should be committed separately. > > I can provide more information about changes to specific files if necessary. Thanks for contribution. I'm trying to make platform-independent part of mips/ tree and userland stable and once it's done more time will be available for adding new platforms (I hope it will be soon enough) :) Meanwhile I'd appreciate if you test attached patch for busdma with your hardware. This implementation has been shamelessly ripped from arm code tree and should handle alignment/boundaries limitations properly. If possible, test with several DMA-enabled devices working simultaneously. Thanks. Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/busdma.diff