From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 8 11:12:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE0437B401; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:12:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f58IDqD62446; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:13:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from vega.vega.com (das0-l111.uic-in.net [212.35.189.238]) by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f58ID9r10441; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:13:10 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f58IBhH20944; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:11:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B21155D.D03BEBE5@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 21:11:42 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: FreeBSD Ports , jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, sf@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 4.1.0 and include/GL/glu.h References: <20010608122321.W3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B210DE6.E938A4B4@FreeBSD.org> <20010608124901.X3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:39:50PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > > Several days ago I've sent a patch that fixes that problem to portmgr@ > > consideration. Check your archives for details > > Ah, you're right. But I think maybe it would be a good idea just > to segregate Mesa3 into two ports, Mesa3 and libglut, because it > seems XFree86 provides the full libGL but consistently leaves out > all or part of libglut. Yes, this could be a way to go. Actually I'm already thinking about something like that, but have not came to the final conclusion yet. > Or we could just remove GL from the > XFree86 install and make it depend on Mesa3 instead... but that > wouldn't work (and nor would the first suggestion, but it would > affect fewer people since libglut is not really that widely > used) if XFree86 has their own local hacks for MesaGL. Yes, this is not a good idea, because libGL from XFree86 is different from those from Mesa3 (dri, glx etc), so it would be a Great Pain in Ass[tm] to do and maintain properly. > Anyway, I'm really tired of having to deal with the shortcomings > of the XFree86 ports, and they've had too many for the last two > years. Indeed. > I really wonder what kind of crack those guys smoke, and > where I can get some of it. Perhaps Jean-Marc can tell me. ;) Please send your findings to the developers@ (or at least portmgr@), so we could use it as well. 8-) -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message