From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 25 2: 9:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB42337B718 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 02:09:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA52717; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:09:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200103251009.MAA52717@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: ICH2-M IDE controller In-Reply-To: from Benjamin Close at "Mar 25, 2001 10:19:13 am" To: linux@senet.com.au (Benjamin Close) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Benjamin Close wrote: > Hi All, > Is anyone looking at supporting the Intel ICH2-M IDE controller? Yes. > This controller is basically the same as the ICH2 controller except it has > extra powermanagment features as it's the for portable computers (hence > the M=mobile). I'm currently using the attached patch which runs > flawlessly on my laptop. However, I'm just an amature code hacker and > hence can't guarentee I haven't missed something between the chipsets. This patch seems about right, I have something very semilar in one of my trees here, just I havn't had a chance to test it yet, but if this works for you I guess I have my case :) > The other question I have is why in ata-dma.c is there the fall through to > the ICH chipset? It seems to prevent any drive actually using ATA100/UDMA5 > features. The fallthrough is just for modes less than ATA100 which is setup the same way as on the ICH therefore the same code.. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message