From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 29 06:45:43 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 82F8916A4CE; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 04F0D43D39; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:45:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0TEjdoZ007785;
	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:45:40 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:28:54 +0200."
             <20040129142854.GG19899@FreeBSD.org.ua> 
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:45:39 +0100
Message-ID: <7784.1075387539@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_glue.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:45:43 -0000

In message <20040129142854.GG19899@FreeBSD.org.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:

>> One short-range improvement for the contiguous kernel would be to
>> abandon linker-sets, and instead generate a C-function at compile
>> time which people could inspect to see what's going on.
>>=20
>Time for rcorder(9)?  ;)

you mean lorder(1) ?  :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.