From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 18:50:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DC71065670 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8BF8FC0A for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0MIo3Si019025 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0MIo3n0019024; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200901221850.n0MIo3n0019024@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= Cc: Subject: Re: docs/130895: No man page installed for padlock(4) on amd64 sytstem (Via Nano processor) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/130895; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/130895: No man page installed for padlock(4) on amd64 sytstem (Via Nano processor) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:42:00 +0100 > >Description: > > The man page for padlock(4) wasn't installed on a new system that I > built up last night. > > It's a VIA VB8001, running -CURRENT amd64. > > At a guess it's absence might be explained by padlock historically > only existing on 32 bit platforms? The man page source is available > at: > > /usr/src/share/man/man4/man4.i386/padlock.4 Yes because. The padlock(4) driver is built only on i386. > >Fix: > > Possibly just moving the man page source to > > /usr/src/share/man/man4/padlock.4 That's not enought to make it built on amd64. We should include it (at least) in sys/conf/files.amd64 and sys/modules/Makefile The good question is does the actual padlock work on the via nano processor?