From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 16:40:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCB837B401; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7266E43F85; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:40:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h45NeCA7048272; Mon, 5 May 2003 17:40:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:38:01 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030505.173801.71910777.imp@bsdimp.com> To: nectar@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> References: <20030501191027.GA53801@madman.celabo.org> <20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:40:18 -0000 In message: <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: : So, I advocate hiding all symbols in libc by default. The Real World : doesn't seem to care whether the symbols are defined by any standard or : not. >From a security perspective, this makes good sense. Warner