From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 31 10:02:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD4216A4EE for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordilin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4419143D49 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jordilin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so296767nzn for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:02:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CEMKAa//PwPMCnQvVSog40lhOuuUBdQ86gzMrfgcLo94D7coiK9zKpqtZySnDqN2iIleXLd3YjtC719o6g5ztVXWbZovNuVDnqX4W+TqV1Temyg+/h0meZcjXJlQ9UMbLlvDeFpBEIiyyplJc+35DVZ/fAY+R25oPUyAbZj9Qe8= Received: by 10.65.157.13 with SMTP id j13mr802561qbo; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.231.11 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <94ff3700608310302n15217834icb82dc320480a330@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:02:52 +0200 From: "Jordi Carrillo" To: skylar@cs.earlham.edu In-Reply-To: <44F62CEE.9040202@cs.earlham.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <94ff3700608301020l34251166nbdb4d72842e1bb86@mail.gmail.com> <20060830181240.65785.qmail@web83106.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <94ff3700608301302n13f9aabcs935fbe6403601d30@mail.gmail.com> <44F6036E.7050203@cs.earlham.edu> <1156982800.1017.37.camel@genius.i.cz> <44F62CEE.9040202@cs.earlham.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com, Michal Mertl , phoenix.lists@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:02:54 -0000 2006/8/31, Skylar Thompson : > > Michal Mertl wrote: > > No! Kernel threads (e.g. handling interrupts) aren't that much different > > to normal processes. > > > > Logical CPUs on a single HTT capable CPU share most of the CPU logic, > > especially all the external stuff (handling interrupts). Scheduling > > handling of interrupts on the "secondary/logical" core wouldn't > > probably help performance at all (if that is at all possible). > > > > Could you clarify note 20031022 in /usr/src/UPDATING? It states that HTT > CPUs are used for interrupts if they are detected, even if they aren't > used by regular processes. Was this something that just showed up in > pre-6.x releases? > > -- > -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) > -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ > > > > > Another question that's wondering me is why FreeBSD with the SMP kernel the gnome system monitor (Applications->System Tools->System Monitor) only shows one CPU when Linux with a SMP kernel shows two CPUs -- http://jordilin.wordpress.com