From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 30 13:56:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA13820 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 13:56:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA13815 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 13:56:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrantr@ix.netcom.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA22141 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:56:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from col-oh2-10.ix.netcom.com(199.183.200.74) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma022050; Thu Oct 30 15:55:39 1997 Message-ID: <34590354.61FD@ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:59:48 -0500 From: Richard Scranton Reply-To: scrantr@ix.netcom.com Organization: LDA Systems, Columbus X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Better DOS telnet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> but you never used ncsa telnet?! ;-) used it ages ago, then found better options. >> does anybody know a better (free) telnet for dos maybe? (except from the Look into MS-DOS Kermit. It does telnet nicely over a packet driver, and has a very complete vt-220 emulation. http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ -- ___________________________________________________________________ Richard Scranton - LDA Systems - Information Management Consulting scrantr@ix.netcom.com Columbus Cincinnati Cleveland Toledo Atlanta is not to be blamed for my rantings.