From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 22:20:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5A216A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:20:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AF2143D41 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:20:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 9147 invoked by uid 65534); 7 Sep 2004 22:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [212.204.44.203]) (212.204.44.203) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 08 Sep 2004 00:20:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <413E3058.50708@samsco.org> References: <413E20FC.80801@samsco.org> <1094593528.845.11.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <413E3058.50708@samsco.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vhXRoGymEiz6syQgw2S6" Message-Id: <1094595624.845.13.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:20:25 +0200 cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Scheduler change X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:20:28 -0000 --=-vhXRoGymEiz6syQgw2S6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 00:04, Scott Long wrote: > Andreas Kohn wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 22:58, Scott Long wrote: > >=20 > >>All, > >> > >>In the interest of getting RELENG_5 stable and ready for 5.3, we are > >>going to switch the scheduler in 6-CURRENT from SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD= . > >=20 > > Wouldn't it make more sense to only switch in RELENG_5, and leave it as > > default in HEAD? > > Or would it complicate testing and current work too much? > >=20 > > Regards, > > Andreas > >=20 > > (This questions basically comes from an interest in good QA and RE > > practices) > >=20 >=20 > We are trying to keep HEAD as a good test-bed for future RELENG_5 fixes. > It's hard to get broad testing of scheduler related things if HEAD and > RELENG_5 are using different schedulers. We also want to see HEAD be > stable enough to develop and test non-scheduler related things too. >=20 > Scott Ah, thank you. -- Andreas --=-vhXRoGymEiz6syQgw2S6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBPjQoYucd7Ow1ygwRAmmmAJ92WLAgBw5oKBEnMogf4fPXylQyMwCeKqpL 1qVVSqTJnhQzsj7V38VKaJg= =Rt4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vhXRoGymEiz6syQgw2S6--