From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 23 13:00:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBA816A420 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B622143D49 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1ND0KoO011030 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1ND0KHo011029; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:20 GMT Message-Id: <200602231300.k1ND0KHo011029@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: Oliver Fromme Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91504: x11-servers/xorg-server-snap doesn't build with WITH_MODULAR X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oliver Fromme List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:00:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/91504; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Oliver Fromme To: lesi@FreeBSD.org (Dejan Lesjak) Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91504: x11-servers/xorg-server-snap doesn't build with WITH_MODULAR Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:57:29 +0100 (CET) First of all, thanks for taking care of this PR! I think it can be closed. See below. Dejan Lesjak wrote: > Modular xorg ports come from same sources as "monolitic" build that is default > in FreeBSD ports but are currently "work in progress". Features that come from > them are currently covered by default ports that x11/xorg meta port depends > upon. Is there anything in particular you think would differ between libGL > port and xorg-libraries port? No. Actually it was just an attempt to get 3D hardware acceleration to work correctly, which I had problems with. So I decided to give the libGL port a try. However, that conflicted with xorg-libraries and led to the reported problem. If the "WITH_MODULAR" switch is currently experimental and not expected to work correctly out of the box, then I suggest it should be marked as experimental, so people don't spend hours trying to get it to work. :-) Other than that, I think this PR can be closed. In the meanwhile, Xorg 6.9 has been released, and 3D acceleration now works fine for me with the updated i915 DRI/DRM stuff. Therefore I have no need to play with libGL and WITH_MODULAR anymore. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "Being really good at C++ is like being really good at using rocks to sharpen sticks." -- Thant Tessman