From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 18 10:33:12 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672CA37B404
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bastet.rfc822.net (bastet.rfc822.net [64.81.113.233])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892E243FBD
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from pde@bastet.rfc822.net)
Received: by bastet.rfc822.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 5FE199F08A; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:36:37 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:36:37 -0500
From: Pete Ehlke <pde-isp-dns@rfc822.net>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Message-ID: <20030618173637.GB32151@rfc822.net>
References: <3EF061D9.7000609@potentialtech.com>
	<200306181612.KAA21256@lariat.org> <20030618165119.GA31988@rfc822.net>
	<3EF0A086.6000103@potentialtech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3EF0A086.6000103@potentialtech.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bsd daemon chick wallpaper??
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:33:12 -0000

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:25:26PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> confused by pointers doesn't mean she can't write useful code.  I mean, many
> of the high-level languages don't even use pointers, right?
> 
I've heard this, as well. I don't trust any of them.