From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 13 22:36: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ebola.biohz.net (ebola.biohz.net [206.80.1.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2440637B4C5 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:36:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from flu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ebola.biohz.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D1C43A3CB; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:35:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000001c04e05$269b7860$0402010a@biohz.net> From: "Renaud Waldura" To: "FengYue" , References: Subject: Re: PPPoE w/ nat auto fragmentation hack? Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:35:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote an article about this setup. Should be published soon enough. http://renaud.waldura.com/doc/freebsd-pppoe/ I'd like to get your feedback on the section making use of tcpmssd: it doesn't seem to work when the link is brought up automatically by ppp. --Renaud ----- Original Message ----- From: FengYue To: Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 1:40 PM Subject: PPPoE w/ nat auto fragmentation hack? > > Hi, Any of you happened to hack the PPPoE support on Fbsd 4.x to > automatically fragment the IP datagram if whatever device behind the > NAT refuses to adjust its MTU? > > Thanks > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message