From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 29 16: 5:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E0E37B73C; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:05:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FEB1E002; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 19:05:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA06929; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 19:05:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id QAA02196; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004292304.QAA02196@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: ade@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comms/hylafax Cc: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:04:24 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2g/makemail 2.9a Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org AFAIK, hylafax is still the most full-featured FAX server available for UNIX. People in a trusted firewalled environment, for example, have much less to worry about with respect to the security holes that exist. (e.g. many workstations in my environment have no root password, so who cares about getting setuid uucp?) Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message