From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 04:08:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47E616A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s1.vhost.cz (s1.vhost.cz [195.39.16.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208AF43FE5 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:08:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from konfer@mikulas.com) Received: (qmail 21367 invoked by uid 89); 29 Sep 2003 13:08:50 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO mikulas.com) (jiri@mikulas.com@195.122.204.155) by s1.vhost.cz with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 13:08:50 +0200 Message-ID: <3F781270.3020708@mikulas.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:07:28 +0200 From: Jiri Mikulas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; cs-CZ; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030710 X-Accept-Language: cs MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: procfs problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:08:53 -0000 Hello i have problem with /proc i already have options PROCFS options PSEUDOFS in kernel but get these messages ~~~cut~~~ map02# strace -p 730 strace: open("/proc/...", ...): No such file or directory trouble opening proc file map02# truss -p 730 truss: cannot open /proc/730/mem: No such file or directory map02# ps aux | grep 730 root 730 0.0 1.0 3476 2448 ?? Ss 8:40AM 0:00.21 /usr/sbin/sshd map02# uname -a FreeBSD map02.modrany.czf 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #5: Sun Sep 28 23:37:08 CEST 2003 mik@map02.modrany.czf:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER i386 ~~~cut~~~ the same messages i get also at 5.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p3 #2: Wed Sep 17 00:17:40 CEST 2003 box any ideas or do i something wrong? (forget I read anything about new procfs - sorry if yes ...) ? thaks for reply Jiri