From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 19 18:49:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from public.bta.net.cn (public.bta.net.cn [202.96.0.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB04A1518D for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 18:49:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from worthope@public.bta.net.cn) Received: from public.bta.net.cn (TCE-E-7-179-95.bta.net.cn [202.106.179.95]) by public.bta.net.cn (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA27782 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:46:43 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <37BCB227.9345E859@public.bta.net.cn> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:40:55 +0800 From: worthope Organization: worthope X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd vs nt and for ia64 merced Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi, > I am leiyin. I am from china. I love freebsd because it is > unbelievable stable. I think it is > superior to linux in many respects. What I want to know is whether > Freebsd can outrun > winnt in the web test just like made in june by PC Week lab.I also know > the support for > smp in freebsd is not very good,however the data show that a > quadri-processor linux can > not rival with single-processor winnt,why? I wish I can get some > comparision data about > freebsd and winnt under some extreme workloads.Freebsd is under > development , so does windows.Can you supply some thing about winnt4.0 > vs freebsd 3.0. In addition to this, is there a plan for IA64 freebsd. I > know intel merced will appear next year. > > In china,freebsd is not well known. I believe the status would change > with time. > > Long live FreeBSD! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message