From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jan 23  9:29:58 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.51])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B458237B404
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wei.ccs.neu.edu (prakash@wei.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.197])
	by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.10.0.Beta10/8.10.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f0NHSAX05669;
	Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:28:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:28:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Viswanathan Prakash <prakash@ccs.neu.edu>
To: Dan Cuthbert <daniel.cuthbert@uk.psi.com>
Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, simakin <simakin@rw.ru>,
	questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: Re[2]: dual CPU under FreeBSD - does it really good thing?
In-Reply-To: <BEECILCKHMFGNBEGEBFKOELBCOAA.daniel.cuthbert@uk.psi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0101231205020.15188-100000@wei.ccs.neu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


No. Top just prints the process details.

osview on Solaris shows (as one of its options) all the CPUs
with their registers, % utilisation, etc. side by side. I received an
email from Mike just as I was sending this one. I'l look at the ports he
talked about before ranting any more.

Thanks a lot guys,

Prakash

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Dan Cuthbert wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> is top what your looking for?
> 
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Viswanathan
> Prakash
> Sent: 23 January 2001 16:53
> To: Mike Meyer
> Cc: simakin; questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: dual CPU under FreeBSD - does it really good
> thing?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi. I was following this discussion and had a question. Is there a
> utility, like osview on Solaris, which lets you look at CPU
> utilization,
> load, etc?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Prakash
> 
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
> 
> > RW <simakin@rw.ru> types:
> > > Thank you, Mike!
> > > 
> > > I try to explain my question - can I tell to process (apache, for
> > > example) to work only on first (or second) CPU?
> > > Does it possible to execute something like
> > >      /usr/local/sbin/snmpd &2  # using second CPU
> > > or like this
> > >      cpu_manager cpu=2 process=/usr/local/sbin/snmpd
> > > May be stupid example, but in NT we can point to services on
> > > which cpu they must run.
> > 
> > Nope, you can't do that. Given that the two processors are treated
> > symmetrically (that's what the S in SMP is for), why would you want
> > to run it on anything other than the first available CPU?
> > 
> > 	<mike
> > 
> > > >>  Can I separate tasks between different CPUs?
> > > MM> I'm not sure what you're asking.  You can't specify which CPU
> > > a task MM> winds up on, or which tasks wind up on different CPUs.
> > > You can break MM> your computing job up into tasks however you
> > > want to, but the system MM> will decide which tasks run on which
> > > CPU.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > --
> > Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>			http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
> > Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more
> > information.  
> > 
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> > 
> 
> - -- 
> Prakash
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
> 
> iQA/AwUBOm24ldg3Mtg4nR8oEQK61ACg9Z/T8KVUf9ZM1TESM/IM/ISkk5QAoK5u
> +ndt126x3AmzVxqrh3lEFena
> =dJSv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

-- 
Prakash





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message