From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 31 4:24:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E3C37B405 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 04:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vega.vega.com (dialup15-59.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.229.187]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA19378; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:02:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7VA1bo69770; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:01:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B8F60C9.D81E284F@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:02:49 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Philippe CASIDY Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, roam@ringlet.net Subject: Re: Which one to choose between devel/gettext and devel/gettext-devel References: <200108310818.f7V8IQ645101@greatoak.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Philippe CASIDY wrote: > Thanks for all you who answered my question! > > On 30 Aug, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > Don't really bother. The gettext-devel creates its PLIST on the fly, so content of > > ports/devel/gettext-devel/pkg-plist is irrelevant. To answer the original question, yes, you > > need both these ports, because binary utilities from the old gettext can't handle some files > > But installing two ports with the same PORTNAME will mess up the ports > system, isn't it? No, not really. It is OK AFAIK. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message