From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 1 15:10:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2374A14FFB; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:10:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: from holly.dyndns.org ([216.62.157.60]) by mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8) with ESMTP id <0FKJ00AI1KAZGX@mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net>; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 17:09:00 -0600 (CST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA03501; Mon, 01 Nov 1999 17:09:57 -0600 (CST envelope-from chris) X-URL: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~chris/ Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 17:09:57 -0600 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: -current build fails In-reply-to: To: Vincent Poy Cc: David O'Brien , FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <19991101170957.I602@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (i386) References: <19991101080418.B602@holly.calldei.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Nov 01, 1999, Vincent Poy wrote: > > That's the perfect example of how and where not to use > > -CURRENT. > > And your argument could be not to use -STABLE or -RELEASE since > both would have the same problems. Like I said before, it's not which Quite the reverse. You _should_ anticipate an unbootable system at each upgrade of -CURRENT. We're not trying to make another -STABLE here. -- |Chris Costello |May the force be... your umbrella! - Plucky Duck `------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message