From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 12 10:19:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA19635 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (ppp0.lariat.org@[129.72.251.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA19627 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solo ([129.72.251.10] (may be forged)) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA26990 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:14:52 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970912111845.008f7c30@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:18:45 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: PC Week recommendation and 2.2.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Did anyone besides me catch the recommendation -- in this week's PC Week -- of FreeBSD as a foundation for an inexpensive server? Also, when will a beta of 2.2.5 be ready? I've wanted to upgrade some machines, but due to problems in 2.2.2-RELEASE have been waiting for 2.2.5, which -- if previous numerical patterns hold -- ought to be stable and robust. --Brett Glass