From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 00:22:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83805F46 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (e.febed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.254.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2684A2702 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6B0N84B014360; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:23:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:18:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: swamped with >100 npviewer.bin processes In-Reply-To: <201407101447.s6AElYWa081401@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <201407101447.s6AElYWa081401@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: corbe@corbe.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:22:53 -0000 On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> From corbe@corbe.net Thu Jul 10 15:39:50 2014 >> >> Anton Shterenlikht writes: >> >>> Not sure which list to address this. >>> >>> I use nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_3 with firefox, >>> as per Handbook. Just noticed that I have 174! >>> npviewer.bin processes after firefox is closed. [ big snip ] >> Doing a 'killall -9 npviewer.bin' every so often solves the problem >> for me. > > ok, so it's not just me. I'll try doing this, Flash has been a thorn in my side for years. I've been doing `killall npviewer.bin`, but a few months ago I whipped this up in frustration: #!/bin/sh # # Keep punching flash in the throat # while [ 1 ]; do sleep 5 echo "Flash is evil and must be destroyed" killall npviewer.bin done > but does this not merit a PR? Not sure. I always thought it was an issue with flash itself, but maybe it has to do with the linuxulator. I suppose a PR wouldn't hurt. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ]