From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 26 19:31:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28499106566C; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38F88FC18; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.173.16.254] (helo=moosi) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MKH9M-00058T-Sj; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:31:53 +0400 To: "Sean C. Farley" References: <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de> <43784537@ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:32:40 +0400 In-Reply-To: (Sean C. Farley's message of "Fri\, 26 Jun 2009 13\:17\:17 -0500 \(CDT\)") Message-ID: <66988167@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: flash10 vs f10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:31:55 -0000 "Sean C. Farley" writes: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> Juergen Lock writes: >> >>> Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT >>> and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10: I got that going after >>> removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10) >>> and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl: >>> libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm >>> and >>> libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm >>> (so we'll need two new ports for these), >> >> Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports >> that something doesn't work without those libraries. >> >>> and then finally to get >>> libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to >>> ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6 >>> - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to >>> avoid that symlink. >> >> Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit >> a new port. Thanks! > > Here you go (at least for the binary): > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-June/006401.html OK, thanks! I should have missed you previous post. Here is a port for tests. This shar should be run at /usr/ports/www: ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/linux/linux-f10-flashplugin10.shar Note: the port is only hand-written and tested to build/install/deinstall. WBR -- bsam