From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jun 7 6:35: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C8137B406 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:35:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #7) id 157zwA-0009A5-00; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:34:58 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f57DYwj42992; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:34:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:34:57 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: brett@lariat.org, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, grog@lemis.com Subject: Re: BSD direction/Damonnews article Message-ID: <20010607143457.B42170@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20010607134347.A41764@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010607055051K.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010607140103.A42170@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010607061351Z.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010607061351Z.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:13:51AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org | Small enough. There are a lot more significant developers in this | project than work for any one company. Speaking of which, has anyone offered any interesting ideas on how a progressive plan might be developed to address the concerns greg lehey voiced in his daemonnews article? What can be done to more effectively direct the volunteer effort, and who should take the lead in doing so? I apologize if i already missed this discussion. If so, i'm off to the -chat archives.... jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message