From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 08:56:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45ECC16A503 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smaug.vex.net (ns.vex.net [216.138.210.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5A343F75 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from x@Vex.Net) Received: from bee.vii.net (hs-209-135-75-127.interlinks.net [209.135.75.127]) by smaug.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CAE485C7; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:56:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bee.vii.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8C65C7A; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:55:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Middleton Organization: xxvii.net To: Lucas Holt , freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:55:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: X-Whee: Yes, Please. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310221155.40121.x@Vex.Net> Subject: Re: freebsddom and java's flaming hoops X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:56:37 -0000 On October 22, 2003 11:04 am, Lucas Holt wrote: > Why don't you change proxy servers if simple javascript doesn't work? Didn't realise it was the proxy that was the problem or I could have disabled it. Though that would have been yet another annoyance to have to do that just to download JDK patches for FreeBSD... just another flaming hoop... a small one, but still... why? Necessary? Maybe... but a potentially additional annoyance. > JavaScript can be a security problem in windows, but i don't see why it > would be disabled in other platforms. Otherwise your proxy just sucks. Well, this is of course simply flamebait: but, because 90% of the time javascript is just incredibly annoying (or worse) on the web, and serves no significantly useful function. My proxy certainly does not suck, it serves it's purpose extremely well... modifying javascript and blocking "ads" and certain javascript calls is one of them. It frees and makes my internet experence greatly improved... I've used it for years and years and years... it builds quickly and cleanly from the ports tree to. (-: Usually it doesn't get in the way of most legit uses of javascript; i'm not sure why it didn't like whatever paranoid technique is being used on the FreeBSD Java 2 site... I haven't looked that far into it. In konqueror i have javascript simply turned off by default; and enable it just on select sites where I know it is needed, and I want to be bothered. It's not security that is the main problem with javascript, it's the widespread annoyance factor. > Even webtv's support javascript (generation 2 or higher). My sega > dreamcast can view sites with javascript. Congratulations, webtv is certainly a standard to look down to. (-: > What version of FreeBSD are you using? It will certainly build on 4.8 5.1-CURRENT-20030821 ... and I do finally have JDK 1.5 building cleanly, with the recently updated patchset. Thanks. I also have the JDK 1.3 binary packge installed on a 4.8 box. It is amazingly annoying to install as well, of course, due to having to grab it from a special location, and click through the agreements and so forth... but at least it installed... and there's a few less flaming hoops... clearly I'm whining. But someone has to. (-: -- Tim Middleton | Cain Gang Ltd | There is a wisdom that is woe; but there x@veX.net | www.Vex.Net | is a woe that is madness. --Melville (MD)