From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 18 12:34:25 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7C916A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:34:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de (sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
	[141.20.20.51])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1953B43D2D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:34:24 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net)
Received: from hadriel.linnet (wll192-81.wlan.hu-berlin.de [141.20.192.81])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	(8.12.10/8.12.9/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.8) with ESMTP id j3ICYJGR011517
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:34:23 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:34:13 +0200
From: sebastian ssmoller <sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20050418143413.058b0598.sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <2304.1113826754@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <4263A33A.3030201@centtech.com>
	<2304.1113826754@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: powerd(8)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:34:25 -0000

> 
> I don't think a proportional approach will work in this case, the steps
> are too far apart.
> 
> I also think the switch to full speed is wrong.  Such see-saw
> algorithms waste far too much time decaying.  A less steep flank
> should be used.

what about just taking the algo from estctrl? i dont know what algo exactly
it implements but it worked very well for me ...

regards,
seb