From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 25 03:42:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA28378 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 03:42:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [139.23.36.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA28373 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 03:42:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Andre.Albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (mail.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david.siemens.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA06404 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 12:37:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA04385 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 12:42:19 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA02366 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 12:42:18 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199710251042.MAA22309@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Subject: Re: running routed: Is my printer a router ? In-Reply-To: from Doug White at "Oct 24, 97 11:08:39 pm" To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 12:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > ignore RTM_GET: 192.168.21.92/32 > > > > -- 21:49:01 -- > > > > RTM_ADD from pid 8022: 192.168.21.92/32 > > > > routed: ignore RTM_ADD without gateway > > > > > > > > The timestamps are axactly the same as in syslog, so it's really > > > > 192.168.21.92 who has to do with it. But: The address > > > > 192.168.21.92 belongs to a networked printer ?!? > > > > > > The system is trying to create a host route for that box, which is normal, > > > but routed will have nothing of it. If you don't need routed, disable it > > > and it will shut up. > > > > By system you mean the machine routed is running on, right? As far as > > I interpret the log, there is something sent from the printer (which is > > 192.168.21.92) to the system, which makes it complain. > > I have about 70 machine on three NICs on the system running routed (PCs, > > MACs, HPs, SGIs, Suns, HP-Printers, and of course, FreeBSD machines), > > but 192.168.21.92 is the only Kyocera Printer. Is it possible that just > > the Kyocera is doing something strange about what routed complains? > > Your computer is probably trying to contact the printer and the routing is > wrong. What does ifconfig -a and netstat -rn report? Don't think so. Everything works great, even the communication between the printer and all the other hosts. I still got the impression that the printers send something crazy to routed. To be correct, in the meanwhile I found out that both FreeBSD machines complain: Oct 25 12:30:30 server daemon.err routed[131]: ignore RTM_ADD without gateway Oct 25 12:30:30 printfix daemon.err routed[85]: ignore RTM_ADD without gateway printfix is a machine with one NIC, server it the router with 3 NICs: andre@server:~>ifconfig -a de0: flags=c943 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.20.33 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.20.255 ether 00:00:c0:ba:73:e0 de1: flags=c943 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.21.33 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.21.255 atalk 65280.171 range 0-65534 phase 2 broadcast 0.255 ether 00:00:c0:81:78:e0 ed0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.16.33 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 ether 00:00:c0:0f:aa:dd lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 atalk 0.0 range 0-0 phase 2 andre@server:~>netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 2 3674 lo0 192.168.1 192.168.16.30 UGc 1 1 ed0 192.168.16 link#3 UC 0 0 192.168.16.30 0:0:c0:8d:69:ab UHLW 6 101116 ed0 332 192.168.16.33 0:0:c0:f:aa:dd UHLW 3 376419 lo0 192.168.16.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 1550 ed0 192.168.20 link#1 UC 0 0 192.168.20.2 8:0:69:1:8:ee UHLW 0 730 192.168.20.3 8:0:69:6:c8:b3 UHLW 0 61 de0 902 192.168.20.4 8:0:69:7:66:74 UHLW 3 3628537 de0 472 192.168.20.5 8:0:69:8:5d:46 UHLW 1 241 de0 145 192.168.20.10 8:0:20:10:79:39 UHLW 0 724 de0 59 192.168.20.33 0:0:c0:ba:73:e0 UHLW 17 1171965 lo0 192.168.20.120 0:20:af:f5:ee:24 UHLW 0 15942 de0 789 192.168.20.121 0:60:97:81:95:c4 UHLW 0 315 de0 829 192.168.20.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 1 1550 de0 192.168.21 link#2 UC 0 0 192.168.21.20 8:0:9:3d:8d:a UHLW 0 5980 de1 655 192.168.21.21 0:60:b0:1:76:57 UHLW 0 700929 de1 655 192.168.21.31 0:0:c0:4f:53:c3 UHLW 1 94238 de1 355 192.168.21.32 0:0:c0:3f:6e:ab UHLW 0 19475 de1 851 192.168.21.33 0:0:c0:81:78:e0 UHLW 0 1 lo0 192.168.21.92 0:c0:eb:0:91:7e UHLS 0 0 de1 401 192.168.21.100 0:0:c0:ee:24:d3 UHLW 2 1379432 de1 1020 192.168.21.102 0:a0:24:88:e2:f6 UHLW 2 885 de1 1027 192.168.21.107 0:0:c0:b9:4e:e9 UHLW 0 805736 de1 1023 192.168.21.113 0:0:c0:4c:5b:d3 UHLW 0 715779 de1 1148 192.168.21.114 link#2 UHLW 1 21941 192.168.21.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 1550 de1 192.168.32 192.168.16.30 UGc 0 376 ed0 192.168.48 192.168.16.30 UGc 2 6053 ed0 224/4 link#3 UCS 0 0 224.0.0.9 1:0:5e:0:0:9 UHLW 1 6 ed0 On the same wire are also two HP-UX machines running gated without complains, but since almost half of HP-UX is broken they are no reference. The crazy thing is, I can't see anything on the network coming from the printer (192.168.21.92). Or I am doing something wrong with tcpdump... -Andre