From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 06:34:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E6DBB8; Thu, 29 May 2014 06:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34682292; Thu, 29 May 2014 06:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B824C33C18; Thu, 29 May 2014 02:34:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CC72B39813; Thu, 29 May 2014 02:34:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/mailman port installation failing References: <20140528063641.GF9361@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20140529041628.GE12961@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 02:34:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140529041628.GE12961@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> (John Marshall's message of "Thu, 29 May 2014 14:16:28 +1000") Message-ID: <444n09f5zw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: mandree@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 06:34:19 -0000 John Marshall writes: > After helpful off-list mail from mandree@ which pointed at this being a > local problem, I eventually found the following line in > /usr/local/etc/ports.conf. > > mail/mailman: CONFIGURE_ARGS=--with-var-prefix=/data/mailman > > One of those tweaks one implements to accommodate a local customization, > and doesn't even remember it's there 6 or 7 years later. > > It would appear that this kind of thing doesn't play nicely with the new > staging environment. After removing that line from ports.conf and > rebuilding the port, it installed happily. Obviously I then had to > reshuffle my data directories manually. Doesn't that mean that the plist was always wrong on that machine anyway? That could leave stale files around...