From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 08:20:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C531065675; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out8.libero.it (cp-out8.libero.it [212.52.84.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771168FC1B; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:20:14 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0208.4E9BE53D.0102,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.187.122) by cp-out8.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4E68B78605D0771E; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:20:13 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9H8Jw7e018421; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4E9BE52E.70202@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:19:58 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Villa References: <4E9BD601.9060208@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UPDATING 20111016 and KDE3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:20:15 -0000 On 10/17/11 10:08, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> Using KDE3, I have ortp as a dependency of kdenetwork. >> Should I follow the above or is it ok only for KDE4? >> Is it needed? Would it harm anything? > > linphone-base is required by kdenetwork4, if you don't have it you can > skip that line. I'll add it to UPDATING, thanks. > > If you have both kdenetwork3 and 4, well, I don't know. You can try > proceeding with that step and seeing if kdenetwork3 still works, and > report back. I thought it was quite unlikely that people had > kdenetwork3 and 4 installed at the same time. Should this be a > problem, I'll end up making it optional in kdenetwork4.