From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Mar  5 19:22:51 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA09887
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:22:51 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA09795;
          Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:21:29 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA14627; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:59:10 -0800 (PST)
To: Christopher JS Vance <vance@usq.edu.au>
cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bind 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 12:54:44 +1000."
             <19980306025444.24233.qmail@hilda.sci.usq.edu.au> 
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 18:59:10 -0800
Message-ID: <14623.889153150@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I can't expect the sendmail situation to change but one could ask: 
> Which version of BIND will go in 2.2.6-R and later -STABLEs?

The same one that shipped with 2.2.5.

> And while I'm at it, should I assume that perl will stay at 4?

Yep.  We've still yet to find someone to bmake perl5 and get it into
the proper shape for inclusion in -current, much less -stable. :(

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message