From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 23 08:45:31 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54F916A417;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D45013C428;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A8E20B2;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE73E20B1;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B4EF784479; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net>
References: <835936.35104.qm@web34510.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<A502D00B-80A7-4BC6-9842-D0A2A50E2026@mac.com>
	<86r6lvalht.fsf@ds4.des.no> <46CC16F6.7020904@micom.mng.net>
	<86ejhvai7g.fsf@ds4.des.no> <46CCE3E5.9060100@micom.mng.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:45:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <46CCE3E5.9060100@micom.mng.net> (ganbold@micom.mng.net's message
	of "Thu\, 23 Aug 2007 09\:33\:25 +0800")
Message-ID: <864piq3ahn.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What is a "sane" setting for maxdsize when running amd64? it
	seems many normal suggestions do not apply.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:45:31 -0000

Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net> writes:
> We are using several squid machines (6 machines, each have all others
> as a siblings) for transparent caching/proxying using gre tunnel and
> wccp2 (with Cisco router).  Can varnish work in such situation?

Probably not; Varnish is a reverse proxy.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no