From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 08:05:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2CC1065672 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (mail.bitblocks.com [64.142.15.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7248FC19 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost.bitblocks.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27FE5B13; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:47:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Robert Watson In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:37:25 BST." References: Comments: In-reply-to Robert Watson message dated "Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:37:25 +0100." Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:47:20 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20090924074720.B27FE5B13@mail.bitblocks.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Three cheers for the status quo, enough now? (was: Re: tmux(1) in base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:05:00 -0000 On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:37:25 BST Robert Watson wrote: > > The current blend of components is largely historical, modeling the mix found > in BSD UNIX, and strikes a hard-to-characterize balance between the logical > extremes "we ship a minimally bootstrapping system" and "we ship every > application under the sun". This means for most parts of the base system > there will be someone who argues it belongs there, and someone who argues that > it doesn't. What would be nice is if the install CDs came with a small number of "profiles" (mini, midi & maxi) and made it easy to pick a profile and install/upgrade to the system described in it. Nicer still would be if there was a way to create custom profiles for specific purposes. Then you have an easy way to clone the same setup to multiple machines. [Not that it would stop such arguments....] I am sure we have been here before!