From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 11 04:46:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA18910 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 04:46:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA18905 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 04:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA03859; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 04:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808111144.EAA03859@implode.root.com> To: Thomas Gellekum cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Marius Bendiksen , Scott , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Huge Bug in FreeBSD not fixed? In-reply-to: Your message of "11 Aug 1998 13:33:56 +0200." <87yasvsqfv.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 04:44:57 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Once, the system had the chance to send a log message: > >Aug 11 13:03:10 tibatong /kernel: Out of mbuf clusters - increase maxusers! > >Anything else I can do? What the system really wants is more mbuf clusters (NMBCLUSTERS kernel option). I suspect the difference between systems that crash with the program and those that don't is in how they are configured. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message