From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Sep 10 09:45:20 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA03317
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:45:20 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA03308
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:45:15 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.34]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id JAA07203; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:44:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id JAA02684; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:46:16 -0700
Message-Id: <199509101646.JAA02684@corbin.Root.COM>
To: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Block size for new filesystems during install? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 10 Sep 95 18:37:33 +0300."
             <199509101537.SAA11237@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:46:14 -0700
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>Is it still A Bad Thing (tm) to have filesystems with a different
>block size on a single box, as was mentioned by someone of wizards
>(Mr. Dyson?) long ago?

   No, it's not a problem any longer.

-DG