From owner-freebsd-chat Tue May 25 13:34:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from ptldpop1.ptld.uswest.net (ptldpop1.ptld.uswest.net [198.36.160.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0ED015AC9 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 13:34:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dpilgrim@uswest.net) Received: (qmail 12590 invoked by alias); 25 May 1999 20:34:42 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG@fixme Received: (qmail 12548 invoked by uid 0); 25 May 1999 20:34:41 -0000 Received: from cdsl201.ptld.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (209.180.170.201) by ptldpop1.ptld.uswest.net with SMTP; 25 May 1999 20:34:41 -0000 Message-ID: <374B095B.17D2ABA2@uswest.net> Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:34:35 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim Organization: Neatly stacked heaps of digital chaos X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jamie Bowden Cc: "Mark S. Reichman" , "Viren R. Shah" , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SETI@home has teams now! References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jamie Bowden wrote: > > On Mon, 24 May 1999, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > :A note on FreeBSD's efficiency: My P2-350 spends almost 38 hours per > :unit when under W98 and that's with nothing else running. The last > :work unit took my P166 running 3.1R just under 30 hours. That's both > :disgusting and hilarious. > > You've got other problems somewhere. My K6/233 in Win98 processes a block > in ~29 hours. In 3.2-R it takes ~19 hours. I would imagine that the video card used has an effect on the amount of CPU used to draw the graphics. Which card are you using? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message