From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 18 12:31:49 2000 From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 12:31:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210DE37B400; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBIKVUw12586; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:31:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Stephen McKay Cc: dmaddox@sc.rr.com, current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? In-Reply-To: Message from Stephen McKay of "Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:00:28 +1000." <200012181500.eBIF0S612182@dungeon.home> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:31:30 -0800 Message-ID: <12581.977171490@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The generated ld.so has bloated a bit :-) but works fine. So we could > in principle build ld.so for every release. It's just a question of > whether we should. I think we should. But it might be just as easy > to copy it off the 3.3 CD every time. It's dead end stuff after all. > > Does the release engineer have an opinion? If it's just for the compat3x distribution, I say check it into that part of lib/compat and be done with it. Uudecoding it each time is a lot easier than building it. Or are we talking about ld.so in some different context? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message