From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 29 04:40:58 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E1916A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfmm.org (walter.dfmm.org [209.151.233.240])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704DB43FE5
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@dfmm.org)
Received: (qmail 83564 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Sep 2003 11:40:55 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 11:40:55 -0000
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jason Stone <freebsd-current@dfmm.org>
X-X-Sender: jason@walter
To: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20030929132758.R35443@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <20030929043600.F55021@walter>
References: <3F781270.3020708@mikulas.com>
	<20030929132758.R35443@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: procfs  problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:40:58 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> JM>map02# strace -p 730
> JM>strace: open("/proc/...", ...): No such file or directory
> JM>trouble opening proc file

> You must mount procfs.
>
> # fstab;
> proc			/proc		procfs	rw		0	0

The bi-weekly status messages have been claiming that all the common
debugging tools except for truss have been converted to work without
procfs, since procfs is now deprecated.  Does that not include strace, or
is there something else wrong here?


 -Jason

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Freud himself was a bit of a cold fish, and one cannot avoid the suspicion
 that he was insufficiently fondled when he was an infant.
	-- Ashley Montagu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Comment: See https://private.idealab.com/public/jason/jason.gpg

iD8DBQE/eBpHswXMWWtptckRAgSoAJ9IcIadlSRauyYJQHDc9GinZ20YCACfVGf1
ysBa4h7i4d99kPhr4xBdfZ8=
=7431
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----