From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 25 12:43:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E391065672 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout5.freenet.de (mout5.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353A18FC17 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.23] (helo=13.mx.freenet.de) by mout5.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.70 #1) id 1NDHDV-0003sq-1b; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:43:29 +0100 Received: from tddc4.t.pppool.de ([89.55.221.196]:36403 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 13.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1NDHDU-0005Ih-OL; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:43:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:43:27 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20091125134327.3d9fb1a5@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20091125110119.GB1387@lonesome.com> References: <20091123190546.GA1210@killasmurf86.pc> <20091125110119.GB1387@lonesome.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aldis Berjoza , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:43:31 -0000 On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote: > > I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no > > OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors? > > OpenOffice is one of our most complex packages, and, depending on which > package node it builds on, can take nearly a day to run. That plus the > large number of dependencies it has makes it hard to build. > > I know that this is not a very satisfactory answer. I promise to once > again look into the problem. > Does the fact that it uses java cause a problem? Used to be that the user had to manually download files from Sun, which would be impractical for an automated run. --- Gary Jennejohn