From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 26 08:23:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FED16A4CE for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from obh.snafu.de (obh.snafu.de [213.73.92.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ACF43D5D for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:23:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AZukL-000AOD-00 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:23:29 +0100 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:23:29 +0100 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031226162329.GA79023@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20031224154121.GA83770@e-Gitt.NET> <20031225204626.GA68589@e-Gitt.NET> <20031225215838.GB68589@e-Gitt.NET> <20031225222029.GC68589@e-Gitt.NET> <20031226002654.GB6757@e-Gitt.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: file descriptor leak in 5.2-RC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:23:33 -0000 Re. On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 03:05:12PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > can you please turn on INVARIANTS and build another kernel ? Just about to do that. > This most likely will panic your machine as it might trigger the > KASSERT() in ffree (kern_descrip.c). a show locks and where would > maybe halep the right people. Well, the machine has a serial console; I hope I do not have to go to the office then ;-) > 1) is anybody _not_ running an i386 or MP machine ? Well, I have only the given config: dual Xeon plus HTT (4 procs virtual). Might it help to turn of HTT? > 2) is anybody using MAC ? options UFS_ACL is in the kernel, but I don't use anything like that, the setup is pretty plain and my kernel differs from GENERIC in removing unneccesary devices and adding the NO_SWAPPING option, since I don't have any swap space. > 3) has anybody noticed this before on 5.x ? I did not have the setup running on 4-STABLE - sorry. I'm a little bit worried up running the machine on 4-STABLE; but since the BIOS offers something like "OS is not ACPI aware" I guess I will have no big troubles. [several minutes later] OK, I booted a kernel with INVARIANTS. At least in 10 minutes of feeding mail into the machine it did not panic. It is a lot slower (although I do not see the CPU time going up too much, it might be an I/O related issue). The mailfeed I give to the machine is a copy of a real mailfeed, I cannot let this feed up for hours in this configuration, because I'm going to build a backlog on the production server and put too much extra load on it. The problem (of course) still exists. What can I do to give more information now? - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! |