From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 1 20:51:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619473F1 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1568C2FD3 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.36]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E7A1078DA for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B7F3F8450 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: Passed host: 188.105.80.80 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-08.arcor-online.net B9CF83AE757 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-188-105-080-080.pools.arcor-ip.net [188.105.80.80]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9CF83AE757 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s51KHgji063223 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s51KHgSr063222 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: please revert graphics/xfig r354029 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <20140531000800.GA57984@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5389D9B6.8030005@FreeBSD.org> <20140531143509.GA60572@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5389EE92.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <20140531150936.GA60696@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140531173128.GA6980@lonesome.com> X-Trace: lorvorc.mips.inka.de 1401653862 62539 ::1 (1 Jun 2014 20:17:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@mips.inka.de User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:51:50 -0000 On 2014-05-31, Mark Linimon wrote: >> I forgot I had the DOCS option unset as it was unset ages ago >> and updates have always worked. The question is "why are changes >> to a port committed without proper testing?" Yes, "proper >> testing" should include testing of the effects of (un)setting >> individual Makefile options. > > The number of combinations is huge. > > It's just not feasible. Which is a good argument that options should be minimized. Instead, ports policy appears to be to make as many options as possible. :-( -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de