From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 23:04:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A63C1065B9A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3458FC14 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0RN4Yjm019021; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:04:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n0RN4Xv2019018; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:04:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:04:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chuck Robey In-Reply-To: <497DF6A1.3020508@telenix.org> Message-ID: <20090128000025.G18824@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1232945177.32181.27.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20090126130242.F69204@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <497DF6A1.3020508@telenix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Da Rock , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solaris Compat? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:04:49 -0000 >> do stupid things > > I really, really dislike the notion that any company, in the selfishly sheer > pursuit of profits, should be able to dictate to anyone what that person should > be able to do, giving that it's within the limits of the law. Not allowing one > to view many sites ISN'T within the moral control of any company. Those who disallow you to view many sites are the sites authors!! Nothing else. Properly designed page is viewable in ANY browser. It's not bad to use flash for some "flashing" adverts, as long as you can browse the site without this. The REAL information doesn't need any extras, and should be always readable with simplest text-based browser. They don't just dumps out potential readers that don't use "the only right" OS and browser. They too - dumps out all disabled people, most importantly blind. It's not a problem for a blind to read plain text on computers (there are LOTS of solutions for this), but navigating in graphics-only manus etc. is impossible.